Relationships between measures of phraseological complexity and writing quality in a CEFR assessment context
AbstractThe present study contributes to understandings of the relationships between bigram and collocation complexity and writing quality by analysing a corpus of student placement tests in the UAE. At the heart of the study lies the need to understand the relationships between bigram and collocation diversity and sophistication. In developing such an understanding, the study extends work in this area by examining an underrepresented CEFR grading context. Using correlation analysis, findings indicate that several bigram and collocation measures correlate positively and negatively with essay grades. When built into regression modelling, the 3 predictors of: number of bigram types, Mean MI bigram type, and the number of non-collocation noun + noun bigram types emerge as significant measures that predict grade variation. The implications of these findings for assessment practices in ELF contexts are discussed.
Jun 16, 2020
How to Cite
MCCALLUM, Lee. Relationships between measures of phraseological complexity and writing quality in a CEFR assessment context. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, june 2020. ISSN 2490-4198. Available at: <http://arjals.com/index.php/Arab_Journal_Applied_Linguistics/article/view/197>. Date accessed: 18 jan. 2021. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1234/ajal.v5i1.197.
Bigrams, collocation complexity, ELF assessment, assessment models.
By submitting to AJAL, authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for an indefinite period of time after publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.