A Comparative Study of Metadiscoursal Features in English Research Article Abstracts in Hard Disciplines

Authors

  • Jing Wei
  • Jing Duan

Abstract

This study investigates how L1 Chinese scholars in hard science disciplines use metadiscourse in their English academic writing, by comparing the deployment of metadiscoursal resources written by L1 Chinese and L1 English scholars. Hyland’s (2005) interpersonal model of metadiscourse was adopted for the analysis. We found that L1 Chinese scholars used less metadiscoursal resources than L1 English scholars on the whole. In the two dimensions of interaction, L1 Chinese scholars made more use of interactive devices, while L1 English scholars used more interactional items. This reflects that L1 Chinese scholars made greater efforts to guide the readers through their papers, and that L1 English scholars are more concerned with creating author identity and engaging their readers. The t-tests confirmed that L1 Chinese scholars used significantly more code glosses in interactive metadiscourse and less self-mentions in interactional metadiscourse. An in-depth analysis reveals two functions of code glosses and five functions of self-mentions in RA abstracts.

Keywords:metadiscourse, English research article abstracts, hard disciplines, L1 Chinese scholars, L1 English scholars

Downloads

Published

03/20/2020

How to Cite

Wei, J., & Duan, J. (2020). A Comparative Study of Metadiscoursal Features in English Research Article Abstracts in Hard Disciplines. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 1–37. Retrieved from https://arjals.com/ajal/article/view/221

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Regular Issue

Section

New Articles

License

By submitting to AJAL, authors agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for an indefinite period of time after publication.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.